Search for: "HARRIS v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT" Results 121 - 140 of 1,822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm by Alison Rowe
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on a case where the main issue is States’ rights to impose their own regulations on federally-inspected slaughterhouses. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm by Alison Rowe
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on a case where the main issue is States’ rights to impose their own regulations on federally-inspected slaughterhouses. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
On June 21, 1989, a deeply divided United States Supreme Court upheld the rights of protesters to burn the American flag in a landmark First Amendment decision. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm by David Kemp
The Fourth Circuit affirmed.The Supreme Court vacated and remanded, overruling Harris v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:52 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Next Wednesday is Dog Sniff day at the Supreme Court, when the Court will hear oral argument in Florida v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm by James Jolin
Jolin POLITICO’s leak of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Justice Edward White Justice White gave as his rationale a citation from a previous case [United States v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 12:10 pm
UNITED STATES (No. 08-5274) United States Supreme Court Opinion Decided: April 29, 2009 Petitioner Dean was convicted of conspiring to commit a bank robbery and discharging a firearm during an armed robbery. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:21 am by Rob McKinney
Two drug dog cases were heard were on the docket this week at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:52 am
The team reports that “When the United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:41 am by Scott Bomboy
His appeal was denied by the 11th Circuit, but Bostock’s attorneys argued the circuit’s precedents conflicted with two United States Supreme Court decisions: Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
It is argued, in particular, that the United Kingdom Supreme Court’s recently-articulated approach to written agreements in the employment law context in Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41 is motivated by a desire to prevent parties from arrogating to themselves (and away from the courts) the power to determine the law: a desire, in other words, to uphold the rule of law. [read post]