Search for: "HILL v. JONES" Results 121 - 140 of 431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the May 17 conference; rescheduled before the March 2, March 16, March 23, March 29, April 13, April 20, April 27, May 10, May 24, May 31, June 7, June 14, June 21, September 24, October 5 and October 12 conferences)   Jones v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Gerald Kogan looks at Jones v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am by Andrew Hamm
Doug Jones’ victory over Roy Moore in the Alabama special election last fall brought the Republican majority from 52 to 51. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:52 am by Edward Foley
His multiple opinions for the court concerning the concept of “racial gerrymandering,” culminating last year in  Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Edith Roberts
Arthur Spiegel in Cincinnati, Ohio, from 1994-96 and then to Judge Nathaniel Jones on the 6th Circuit from 1996-97. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer, Ashley Deeks
“Artificial Intelligence Could Soon Enhance Real-Time Police Surveillance” reads a recent Wall Street Journal headline. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Rulings               IPSO has published a single resolution statement this week and three rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 20525-17 Sutcliffe v dailypost.co.uk 20614-17 Walker v mirror.co.uk: No breach of Principle 1 – Accuracy 20385-17 Hill v express.co.uk: Breach of Principle 1 – Accuracy 19719-17 Thomson v Sunday Post: Breach of Principle 1… [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considered whether the ‘Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police’ immunity, which protects the police from claims when in the course of their core duties they negligently cause injuries to passers-by, applies in a case where the relevant police act was a positive act. [read post]