Search for: "Handy v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2023, 11:08 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
This new law would appear to include independent contractors operating on their own who provide services to on-demand companies or their customers in the gig economy, such as Uber, Lyft, InstaCart, Postmates, GrubHub, TaskRabbit, and Handy. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Subchapter V Decision Tracker Watch and learn from our collection of 750 videos, gathered conveniently in the new Practice Videos Resource Kit . [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 8:31 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
For courts and legislatures interested in anticipating this development in Apprendi law, or interested in joining the states that already recognize that a prior conviction must be proven like any other element whenever it increases the penalty range beyond the range allowed without the conviction, this essay provides a handy reference to existing rules and statutes that could serve as blueprints for reform. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 6:19 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
For courts and legislatures interested in anticipating this development in Apprendi law, or interested in joining the states that already recognize that a prior conviction must be proven like any other element whenever it increases the penalty range beyond the range allowed without the conviction, this essay provides a handy reference to existing rules and statutes that could serve as blueprints for reform. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm by Luke Gilman
It’s cited in Douglas Baird’s chapter in Intellectual Property Stories on International News Service v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm antitrust trial will begin in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 4:01 am by Charles Sartain
The question in Rock River Minerals, LP and Carr v. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
See, e.g., In re Dinnan, 661 F.2d 426, 431–32 (5th Cir. 1981); D’Aurizio v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
See, e.g., In re Dinnan, 661 F.2d 426, 431–32 (5th Cir. 1981); D’Aurizio v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:45 am by Florian Mueller
Judge Hixson has a strong antitrust background, which probably comes in handy with respect to Epic Games v. [read post]