Search for: "Harmon v. Holder"
Results 121 - 140
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
It issues an amended opinion which basically harmonizes the previous ruling with the Second Circuit’s ruling in Viacom. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
Most noticeable there is the ongoing Costco v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Case: Parker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
For the most part, the Chapter 11 process has been able to harmonize the objectives of all financial stakeholders, and achieve equitable, pro-economic results. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am
Legal developments are a bit more complicated: SCt has taken 5 substantive cases in the last decade, and the TM holder has lost every one. [read post]
25 May 2009, 1:37 am
[single citation] In a 2004 decision (SOCAN v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 3:40 am
In 2010, Dimitrios as 51% managing member of Epiros and his late brothers’ daughter Maria and sons John and Stephanos as holders of an aggregate 49% membership interest — the parties disagree whether the latter interest was gifted by Dimitrios or inherited from Elias by some unstated means, but no matter — entered into a seven-page operating agreement. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
"[6] According to the UNIDROIT, the purpose of the protocol related to space assets (the Space Protocol) is; to address the difficult task of applying the benefits of the Convention to space assets, which are increasingly being financed by private-sector investors rather than central governments, which are subject to a myriad of existing regulations under international treaties, and which are often physically located… [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:28 pm
v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm
If you don’t do it, there might be consequences v. you must do it. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
” Slip op. at 62 (quoting from Gerber v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
SBA is also proposing to amend the affiliation test on negative control (at 13 C.F.R. 121.103(a)(3)) and to add the same language to the regulations governing the 8(a) BD Program (at 13 C.F.R. 124.106(h)) and WOSB Program (13 C.F.R. 127.202(h)): SBA will not find that a minority shareholder has negative control where such minority shareholder has the authority to block action by the board of directors or shareholders regarding the following extraordinary circumstances:(i) Adding a new equity… [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Bacer 2016)Quite belatedly, I have been thinking about the relationship between framing ideologies and the production of regulatory systems. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
