Search for: "Harris v. Department of Corrections"
Results 121 - 140
of 326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
” [Abrams v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:18 am
" LeBlanc v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Three cases – Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
“Jurisfiction” is a word coined by Jasper Fforde, author of the Tuesday Next series, one of the more sophisticated set of children’s works that has come to populate this post-Harry Potter era. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
Jessop v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:54 pm
The written consent required under this paragraph shall state that the person seeking the consent is required to register as a sex offender with the department of corrections. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
Harris, 20 F.3d 445 (U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:48 am
Justice Department drew upon letter from Secretary of State Dean Acheson in its brief in Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 1:28 am
Surely, he says, the duty of the UK government is to emphasise that the actions of one of its departments have been carried out in accordance with the law as it stands. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Francis v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
Ireland On Monday 5 December 2022, judgment was handed down in the High Court of Ireland in Moore v Harris & Anor; Morris v Harris & Anor (Approved) [2022] IEHC 677. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:29 am
DEATH CASE SECRETARY, Department of Corrections, Respondent. / O R D E R Tompkins petitions for the writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am
The Sun’s refusal to correct a front page story with a front page correction was, once again, upheld by IPSO. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:20 am
Saravia testified this was not correct as he was `in the middle of [his] engineering degree’ and was passing all of his classes. . . . [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Members of the 83d Congress might beg to correct the record on this point. [read post]
9 May 2009, 8:59 pm
" 838 S.W.2d at 238 n.3 (citations omitted); see, e.g., Harris County v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
In its brief in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
