Search for: "Harris v. Thomas"
Results 121 - 140
of 976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 7:16 am
Education Law §3813 notice of claim involving “a matter of personal interest” distinguished from vindicating a “matter of public interest”Matter of Harris v Board of Educ., Union Springs Cent. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc. and Kisor v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:37 am
In anticipation of the Supreme Court's hearing Florida v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:19 am
(granting business owners the right to deny contraception coverage to female employees on religious grounds), and Harris v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 5:15 pm
Harris make clear that what constitutes unlawful racial gerrymandering will prove critical. [read post]
26 May 2017, 5:08 am
Reid Wilson reports for The Hill that Cooper v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
Dupart v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 5:28 pm
Philip Thomas has the story. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 12:11 pm
Christopher Harris, No. 116,515 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal (petition for review); Criminal possession of weaponKasper C. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:57 pm
ShareUnless they find another case in the next few weeks, the argument Tuesday in Bartenwerfer v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am
This morning the Court will hear oral arguments in Harris v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am
By Thomas Kaufman and Tina Rad Employers breathed a sigh of relief when the California Supreme Court issued its December 29, 2011 ruling reversing the Court of Appeal's decision in Harris v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
Thomas, 2017 U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
Ford and Flowers v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
Weil V. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
In 1965, in Griswold v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:06 am
The case, Jones v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am
After all, four years ago, in Rucho v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm
Hobby Lobby and Harris v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am
” At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen anticipates the Court’s decision – expected in the next few days – in Harris v. [read post]
