Search for: "Hatch v. State Bar"
Results 121 - 140
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
Orrin Hatch spoke in favor of DACA (see Kevin Johnson’s article here). [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 12:30 pm
Orren Hatch (R-UT), together with Sen. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
System In the United States, generic drugs approval is “linked” to pioneer drug patent(s) under the Hatch-Waxman Act by several mechanisms – the Orange Book, the certification process, a notice to the innovator of generic filing, a patent infringement suit, automatic stay of drug approval, and a 180-day generic market exclusivity period. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), PLIVA v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am
Court Rules That State Bar’s Professional Liability Fund Is NOT Subject to MMSEA Reporting Mark Popolizio, of the Crowe Paradis Services Corp. explains the case of Oregon State Bar Professional Liability Fund v. [read post]
13 Aug 2006, 2:24 pm
(Merck KGaA v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm
Instead, it is more likely that the affiliate hatched and executed the attack on its own, raising serious questions as to how much control the group’s leaders actually exercise over its affiliates. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
First, in Estes v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
” The first is United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The bar is a low one and the background law is favorable to true federal officers but removal is by no means automatic and is often denied. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am
In Holt v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Nieves v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:12 am
Mensing: [In Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
The SG even stated that “federal law may circumscribe” a plaintiff’s liability theories, even if it does “not outright bar” them. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 9:36 am
Barring approval of generics until all periods of exclusivity expire. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Abad, No. 06-0338 Conviction for armed robbery and murder is affirmed based on primary holding that defendant's claim under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. section 3162, is barred by the Act's waiver provision, and not subject to review for plain error under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b). [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
See also United States v. [read post]
