Search for: "Hatch v. State Bar"
Results 121 - 140
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 2:35 pm
District Court for the District of New Jersey in Medeva Pharma Suisse A.G. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Catholic Diocese of LansingDocket: 10-760Issue(s): (1) Whether the ministerial exception grounded in the First Amendment bars employees of religious institutions, from asserting a state civil rights claim where the employment action does not involve selection of employees or an examination of church doctrine; (2) whether an employee of a religious institution who is found to be a ministerial employee should be barred from bringing a state whistleblowers'… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:12 am
Mensing: [In Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:29 am
Political party officials, others, barred from receiving court fiduciary appointmentsKraham v Lippman, USCA, 2nd Circuit, Docket No.06-2695 cvSection 36.2(c) of the Rules of the Chief Judge of the State of New York [22 NYCRR 36.2, et seq.] sets out a number of “disqualifications for appointment” as “guardians” or “receivers” by New York State courts. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:38 pm
Stern v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
If the state court rejects the claim on procedural grounds, the claim is barred in federal court unless one of the exceptions to the doctrine of Wainwright v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The Manageable Nationwide Class: A Choice-of-law Legacy of Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:55 am
The Court of Appeals decided that the arbitrator could not mandate compliance with the collective bargaining agreement’s procedural guarantees concerning employee termination without subjecting the State to the loss of Federal funds because of Blackburne’s Hatch Act violation. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
The following three cases were consolidated by the Court: Title: PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:26 am
United States, 09–1555, Beer v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm
Demahy v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:09 pm
(collectively, "Barr") filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") with a Paragraph IV certification under the Hatch-Waxman Act, 21 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
The SG even stated that “federal law may circumscribe” a plaintiff’s liability theories, even if it does “not outright bar” them. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:11 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit’s November 27, 2009 decision in Mensing v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 4:27 am
Consultants, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
In Pasquantino, to take the most obvious example, Justice Thomas (writing for a majority that included Scalia) rejected the argument by Justices Ginsburg and Breyer in dissent that the presumption against extraterritoriality barred application of the federal wire fraud statute to a scheme hatched in the United States to defraud Canada of tax revenue. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
