Search for: "Havener v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2006, 2:41 pm
See City of Fircrest v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am
State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am
Below are links to the complete series of my posts on Trump v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 9:12 am
For the last few days (or maybe I just haven’t read the news in a few days) I’ve been hearing that Cindy Sheehan might be running for congress against Nancy Pelosi. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm
Three weeks ago, CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
Cite: State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 7:05 pm
Given the recent news from Washington State, and the previous news from Georgia, and the historically high unpopularity of both presidential candidates, it seems as if this really could be the year of the faithless elector--at least at levels we haven't seen before, and potentially litigation over the issue that pushes the legal and constitutional issues beyond Ray v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:06 am
In Smith v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:09 pm
Partners, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 3:51 am
The Supreme Court also stated however that it would be a mistake to assume from cases in this area that there is a “general principle” that equity will protect solicitors from any unconscionable interference with their expectations in relation to recovery of their charges. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:35 am
Last week, I blogged about the Supreme Court's opinion in Lewis v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:45 pm
Wentworth Originations, L.L.C. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:10 am
Vermont and Rhode Island also acted to ensure that the right to make decisions regarding pregnancy will remain protected in their states, regardless of what the Supreme Court might do to Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:53 pm
Remember United States v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:57 pm
KIUC is charged with nine counts each of taking threatened species in violation of 16 USC §§ 1538(a)(1)(G) and 1540(b)(1) and Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, § 17.31(c) and (a); and taking migratory birds in violation of 16 USC §§ 703(a), 707(a).I haven't had time to do more than scan it and I'm no expert at environmental law - especially endangered species (we'll learn about it together as the case progresses) - but I notice that many of the… [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:10 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 5:53 am
DeStefano case decided earlier this year by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
On April 20, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
