Search for: "Henkels " Results 121 - 140 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2012, 9:43 am by Lori J. Paul, AACP
 Don’t fight over the little things, like who will get the large punch bowl and who will get the set of Henkel knifes, even if your spouse is. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:27 am by Dan Filler
In conjunction with Professor Laura Napoli Coordes of the Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Professor Andrew Dawson of the University of Miami Law School, Professor Adrian Walters of IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, and Professor Christoph Henkel of the Mississippi College School of Law, the members of the Arizona State University Corporate and Business Law Journal are organizing the symposium. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:35 am
., Beckman Coulter, Bridgestone Americas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cargill Incorporated, Caterpillar, Cephalon, CheckFree, Corning, Dow Chemical, Eastman Chemical, Electronics for Imaging, E.I. du Pont (DuPont), Eli Lilly, ExxonMobil, General Electric, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Henkel Corporation, Hoffman-La Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Monsanto, Motorola, Novartis, Patent Café.com Inc., Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Sangamo… [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm by admin
**Federal Trade Commission Staff Provide Guidance on Regulations Proscribing the “All or Virtually All” Standard for Made in the USA labeling** . . . [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:49 am by Florian Mueller
But the unreasonable burden placed on them impedes innovation.Professor Joachim Henkel (Technical University of Munich) presented the economics perspective on patent licensing in the IoT business. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:38 am by PJ Blount
Whereas air traffic controllers dedicate themselves to the protection of the flying public; Whereas air traffic controllers react to dangerous and complex situations on a daily basis, doing so in a calm and professional manner; Whereas air traffic controllers work all day long and all year long, including holidays, to provide services to aircraft in their assigned airspaces; Whereas, due to the highly stressful and demanding nature of the job and the total concentration required, air traffic… [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:15 am by Larry Ribstein
FN 176:  See United States v Kordel, 397 US 1 (1970); Hale v Henkel, 201 US 43 (1906) (reasoning that the corporation was a separate entity for Fifth Amendment purposes although not for purposes of applying the Fourth Amendment). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Gastil, Penn State University; Katherine Knobloch, University of Washington; Justin Reedy, University of Washington; Mark Henkels, Western Oregon University; Katherine Cramer Walsh, University of Wisconsin, Madison: Hearing a Public Voice in Micro-Level Deliberation and Macro-Level Politics: Assessing the Impact of the Citizens’ Initiative Review on the Oregon Electorate. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:35 am by Dennis Crouch
Sincerely, Clark Asay (BYU); Carliss Baldwin (Harvard Business); James Bessen (BU); Jeremy Bock (Memphis); Michele Boldrin (Wash U Econ); Michael Burstein (Yeshiva); Andrew Chin (UNC); Lauren Cohen (Harvard Business); Wesley Cohen (Duke Business); Kevin Collins (Wash U); Jorge Contreras (Utah); Robert Cook-Deegan (Duke Public Policy); Ben Depoorter (Hastings); Samuel Ernst (Chapman); Robin Feldman (Hastings); Lee Fleming (Berkeley); Roger Ford (UNH); Brian Frye (Kentucky); William… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906) (corporation gets Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures but not protected by Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination); Blake v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:55 pm
On reading this, the Dutch Supreme Court acknowledged that the Den Bosch Court of Appeal had applied the correct test for assessing the distinctive character of a shape (Joined Cases C-456/01 P and C-457/01P Henkel KGaA v OHIM; Case C-25/05 August Storck KG v OHIM and Joined Cases C-53/01, C-54/01 and C-55/01, Linde AG). [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:39 am
Disputes of that nature are the consequence of the exercise of public powers by one of the parties to the case, as it exercises powers falling outside the scope of the ordinary legal rules applicable to relationships between private individuals (see, to this effect, Case C-172/91 Sonntag, paragraph 22; Case C-167/00 Henkel, paragraph 30; Case C-266/01 Préservatrice foncière TIARD, paragraph 30; and Case C-265/02 Frahuil). [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 12:33 pm by Veronika Gaertner
In this respect, the BGH referred to the ECJ's judgment in Henkel (C-167/00) where the ECJ had held that "[t]he concept of 'harmful event' within the meaning of Article 5 (3) of the Brussels Convention is broad in scope […] so that, with regard to consumer protection, it covers not only situations where an individual has personally sustained damage but also, in particular, the undermining of legal stability by the use of unfair terms which is the task of… [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 11:12 am by Vincent LoTempio
But others such as Timo Fisher and Joachim Henkel's aren't convinced. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Michael Ramsey
Henkel (1901) with respect to Cuba, which it found not to be part of the United States, although then under U.S. occupation, because there had been no formal acquisition and the occupation was understood to be temporary. [read post]