Search for: "Hernandez v State of New York"
Results 121 - 140
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:31 am
Moreover, the record does not show that plaintiff was incapable of protecting her legal rights despite her mental health diagnosis (see Burgos v City of New York, 294 AD2d 177, 178 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:42 pm
Abbasi and Hernandez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am
Constitution Daily reports on Hernandez v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am
Michael Crowley reports for the New York Times. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
Her claims under the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) and Title VII were dismissed without prejudice (Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
For those who desire an annotated journey through the President's speech, you may find the following of some value: here (New York Times), here (The Washington Post), and here (NPR). [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 12:30 am
LEXIS 27686 (WD NY, March 31, 2008), a New York federal district court rejected claims by plaintiff that her Free Exercise rights were violated while she was held as a pre-trial detainee. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 10:49 am
In contrast to Hernandez, the Court in Drenth v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
In Hernandez v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
In the latest episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Kate Shaw and Melissa Murray “talk breaking SCOTUS news; preview three cases from the upcoming November sitting — DACA, Hernandez v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:07 pm
New York City, 293 F.3d 570, 574 (2d Cir. 2002). [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:33 am
The New York Times reports. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:04 am
In Hernandez v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 pm
Miranda, Jr. is a founding partner of the MirRam Group, LLC, a New York State-based marketing and political consulting firm. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that during yesterday’s second argument, in McKinney v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 9:37 am
Yesterday, the First Department extended this ruling to level three sex offenders in Matter of Gilmore v Hernandez, 2007 NY Slip Op 04233. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am
At Final Decisions, Bryan Lammon thinks the court got it right on Wednesday when it held in Holguin-Hernandez v. [read post]
