Search for: "Hoffmann v. Hoffmann"
Results 121 - 140
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:19 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. [2016] EWHC 188 (Pat) come across her desk a few weeks ago. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
Part II of the Yearbook contains a symposium of five articles on ‘Private Law in the UK Supreme Court’ from leading commentators, including two preeminent former Law Lords in private law, Lord Hoffmann and Lord Millett. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:24 pm
This test was supported in Conor where Lord Hoffmann held that the objection of lack of plausibility applies to speculative patents, whose breadth of claim meant that the alleged invention is inherently improbable. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:09 pm
Davies & Justine Pila, The Jurisprudence of Lord Hoffmann (Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2015). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:17 am
Lord Carnwath was more sympathetic to Lord Hoffmann’s position. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
(ECJ, 23.10.2014 – Case C-302/13 – flyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines AS, in liquidation, v Starptautiska lidosta Riga VAS, Air Baltic Corporation AS) In Case C-302/13, flyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines, the ECJ held that an action for damages resulting from the alleged infringement of EU competition rules by two Latvian companies, Starptautiska Lidosta Ri-ga and Air Baltic, was civil and commercial in nature. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm
What makes this particularly amusing and well timed by the CT guys is Geoff Hoffmann was due to come over next week to give the ra-ra speech in the new combined offices around how successful the integration has been!! [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
As Lord Hoffmann said in the Privy Council libel case of Gleaner v Abrahams ([2004] 1 AC 628) “Personal injury awards are almost always made in actions based on negligence or breach of statutory duty rather than intentional wrongdoing. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:27 am
There Lord Hoffmann (with whom the others of their Lordships agreed) approved the following statement of Kitchin J made in Generics v Lundbeck [2007] RPC 32:"The question of obviousness must be considered on the facts of each case. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 6:33 am
Erhard Milch), and NMT 4 (U.S.A. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:16 pm
The Case of Templemire v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:06 pm
For example, it did not assist the claimant in YXB v TNO [2015] EWHC 826 (QB), who has now been named by newspapers, or prevent the judge from informing us that YXB had sent the defendant images of his erect penis and of himself masturbating. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
In Bright Lord Judge CJ cited from Lord Camden CJ’s judgment in Entick v Carrington and from William Pitt, Earl of Chatham. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
It was largely on this binary issue that the House of Lords was divided: Lords Nicholls and Lord Hoffmann felt that there was a public interest in allowing newspapers to publish details about her treatment whilst Lord Hoffmann also thought there was in the photograph (Lord Nicholls felt there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in it) whilst Lords Hope and Carswell and Baroness Hale disagreed. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
This was confirmed in the case of Douglas & ors v Hello! [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
Bayer’s predecessor, Hoffmann-La Roche, filed a US application for FLANAX in February 2004. [read post]
