Search for: "Hope v. Hope" Results 121 - 140 of 23,879
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2008, 2:47 pm
Justice Kennedy’s majority in Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:23 pm by admin
The Court’s ruling applies to all juveniles convicted of homicide who are or were under the age of 18 at the time of their offenses—providing a glimmer of hope to over 2,000 men and women who had previously been sentenced to die in prison. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:14 am by Tom Smith
One has to hope the Iranians are not as close to the zone of immunity as one must fear they are. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:46 am by Huťko
Today, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights is holding a hearing in an important intermediary liability case - Delfi AS v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 12:46 am
  The panel consisted of Lords Hope, Saville, Walker, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 3:20 pm by Megan Geuss
Samsung case would have to be submitted as public documents, something both companies were hoping to avoid. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:22 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Illinois Supreme Court has announced that on Thursday morning, it will hand down its decision in Hope Clinic for Women v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:09 am by admin
When Sarah requested that […] The post Sarah C. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 10:30 am by IPWatchdog
Todd Dickinson of Polsinelli, Judge Theodore Essex of Hogan Lovells, Retired Chief Judge Paul Michel, and Robert Stoll of Drinker Biddle discussed the Supreme Court case eBay Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by Nonprofit Blogger
The Oregon Supreme Court will review a Court of Appeals decision, Hope Presbyterian Church of Rogue River v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm by Timothy Edgar
In my last post, I said that the European Court of Justice decision in Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:45 am by Michael Fox
This is the description of the 4th Circuit's decision lifted entirely from today's Daily Labor Report ($): A medical intern who misdiagnosed patients, prescribed wrong medications, and identified a living patient as deceased could not show he was a qualified individual with a disability under the ADA.Shin v. [read post]