Search for: "Housing Authority v. Peters" Results 121 - 140 of 673
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2018, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Adams, when the labored arguments of Paterson and Peters, of Iredell, Addison and Chase, are no longer remembered. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
(Editor’s Note: This essay was written by Robert Monks and Harvard Law School Visiting Professor Peter Murray.) [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Cody M. Poplin
Jackson wrote in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Richard A. Epstein
  In the field of individual rights that attitude is captured in the generous rendering of public use which was endorsed unanimously in Hawaiian Housing Authority v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 12:53 pm by Terry Hart
In October, Judge Leval wrote the majority opinion affirming a finding of fair use in Authors Guild v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel, Margaret Taylor
As Benjamin Wittes detailed, on March 8, House Judiciary Chair Peter Rodino formally requested the materials submitted to Sirica, noting that the committee had unanimously authorized him to do so. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:53 am by Garrett Hinck
Matthew Kahn posted the White House’s Dec. 11 war powers report. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
<> Stabenow, Peters, Alexander Introduce Vehicle Innovation Act - U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am by Dave
Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council [2011] EWHC 2542 (QB) (subnom oh dear, oh dear)Forgive the length of this note, but this seems to be a significant case with potentially far-reaching ramifications. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am by Dave
Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council [2011] EWHC 2542 (QB) (subnom oh dear, oh dear)Forgive the length of this note, but this seems to be a significant case with potentially far-reaching ramifications. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:10 am by David Doniger
  The Supreme Court upheld this authority in its landmark 2007 global warming decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]