Search for: "Houston v. Houston et al"
Results 121 - 140
of 365
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2016, 11:13 am
In Tummalla et. al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:44 am
Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric LLC et al, 6-10-cv-00557 (TXED June 29, 2016, Order) (Love, M.J.) [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 5:10 am
The case is styled, Resie's Chicken & Waffles Restaurant, et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:43 am
McDermott, Inc., et al. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
Their practices emphasize pharmaceutical patent counseling, patent procurement, and patent litigation. [2] Acorda Therapeutics Inc. et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:22 pm
A Houston Court of Appeals in Queen et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:43 pm
The Debtors cases are jointly administered under the lead bankruptcy case In re Midstates Petroleum Company, Inc., et al. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 2:00 am
On April 1, 2016, the Texas Supreme Court, in Houston Belt & Terminal Railroad Co., et al.. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:23 am
McCrary v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 9:30 am
& Mary Pol'y Rev. 93 (2014) Vanessa Johnson (Houston) et al., King v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:35 am
New Grants ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC, ET AL. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
-Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, no pet.). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 10:24 am
In Immobiliere Jeuness Establissement v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 6:09 am
Rural Trash Service, Inc., et al. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:09 am
It is styled, Dianne Leidy, et al v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:34 am
Houston County Health Care Authority et al – United States District Court – Middle District of Alabama – June 11th 2015) involves a challenge to plaintiff’s dermatology expert witness testimony by the defendant. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:10 am
It is styled, Michael Nall, et al, v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:28 am
State Farm Lloyds, et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:40 am
JORGE MELENDEZ, No. 14-0006 employment workers comp Set to be argued on September 3, 2015 ROY SEGER, ET AL. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
IN RE JARED WOODFILL ET AL., No. 14-0667 The city council responded by keeping the ordinance in place while scheduling a ballot measure asking voters if they wanted to repeal the ordinance . [read post]
