Search for: "Howes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections" Results 121 - 140 of 526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 23 and Thursday 24 June, the Supreme Court will hear the conjoined cases of R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited). [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm by vforberger
The Department also proposes to clarify language in DWD chapter 140 regarding hearing records, Department assistance for people with disabilities at hearings, and to correct minor and technical language in DWD chapter 140. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
”  Data Privacy and Data Protection The Court of Appeal has handed down its judgment in R (Open Rights Group and the3million) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others [2021] EWCA Civ 800 concluding that the ‘immigration exemption’ in Schedule 2 to the DPA 2018 is not compliant with the GDPR. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
  Guidance has also been provided by the Court of Final Appeal as to how such possible inconsistencies should be approached as a matter of construction. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
(See this analysis by Juliette Kayyem, former assistant secretary of homeland security in the Obama administration). [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm by Ellis Cose
Winifred Raushenbush, a freelance writer hired as executive secretary, authored a widely praised pamphlet titled How to Prevent a Race Riot in Your Home Town. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am by Ben Millson (Bristows)
  The final point was how to interpret “authorised in writing by a government department”. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm by Josh Blackman
(We do not opine whether the House was correct in alleging that Blount violated any actual laws of the United States.) [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by Larry
The question is exactly what law was violated and how? [read post]