Search for: "Hudson et al" Results 121 - 140 of 290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, Levy, et al., 397 N.Y.S.2d 142, 143 (2d Dep't 1977)" "The Court finds that Plaintiff has not sufficiently alleged negligent conduct by Defendants. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:16 am by Dan Farber
  In that spirit, here some blogs and twitter feeds featuring junior scholars that we think are worth a look: Matt Festa and Ken Stahl: The Land Use Profs blog Brigham Daniels, Blake Hudson,  Dave Owen, Lincoln Davies, Hannah Wiseman: The Environmental Law Profs blog Ole Pederson: International Law Observer Michelle Bryan Mudd: Et al. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Anthony Boykin, et al., 10 Cr. 391 (CM), unsealed on May 13, 2010, charged 60 defendants with drug distribution offenses, many of whom were part of the Newburgh Bloods. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm by Bexis
  The relevant test, at least up until Sorrell, was stated in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 7:46 am by John Culhane
He knew, somehow, that his parents would be proud of him It was Grisanti, though, who is going to have the Catholic-inflected NOM et al. scrambling for a new playbook. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Pace Law School Library
[et al.]Hudson River.The state of the Hudson report [electronic resource] / New York State Department of Environmental ConservationIndia.Energy law in India / Mohammad NaseemLatin America.Latin America and the Caribbean : atlas of our changing environment [electronic resource] / UNEPPeriodicals.Utah environmental law reviewSustainability.Development without destruction : the UN and global resource management / Nico Schrijver ; forewords by James Crawford and… [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am by Charon QC
Read… I am no expert in sentencing, probation, rehabilitation of offenders et al… but…surely.. we can, as a vaguely civilised nation.. do a bit better than this? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:09 pm by Robert Tanha
Because the plant manager had not personally, that is had not in his own dealings with the Applicant, discriminated against him, he could not be held liable under the Code for the actions of the employer, even if those actions were themselves discriminatory.PROCEDURAL RULINGSEllis et al v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
Sebelius, et al., District Court docket 10-188, in the Eastern District of Virginia.) [read post]