Search for: "I.C." Results 121 - 140 of 275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
“Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO”, 6th edition 2010, I.C.1.8, page 69, in particular I.C.1.8.3, page 73) and questioned whether these criteria were fulfilled by document N28. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
., 2010, I.C.1.4). [6.4.3] The appellant proprietor contested at the oral proceedings (OPs) before the board that the unidentified prior art mentioned in the opposed patent at paragraph [0013] was state of the art under A 54(2) EPC 1973. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:36 am
” In this case, plaintiff's lawyer did just this: As a follow-up to our telephone conversation, please be advised my client has authorized me to tender a settlement offer in the amount of the minimum structure of $250,000.00 with a present value of $187,001.00 which would qualify us to proceed into the Patients Compensation Fund pursuant to I.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 6:15 am
The legal issue in the case was whether Indiana's Guest Statute (I.C. 34-30-11-1) prevented the son from recovering against his father for the injuries he sustained in the accident. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
An anti-ErbB2 antibody for use in a method of treatment to provide clinical benefit as measured by increased time to disease progression of malignant breast cancer characterised by overexpression of ErbB2 in a human patient, wherein said antibody binds to epitope 4D5 within the ErbB2 extracellular domain sequence as determined by a cross-blocking assay using said antibody and antibody 4D5 obtainable from deposit ATCC CRL 10463, and wherein the method comprises combined administration of the antibody… [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
It is established jurisprudence of the boards of appeal that information is available to the public if only a single member of the public is in a position to gain access to it and understand it, and if this member of the public is under no obligation to maintain secrecy (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 6th Edition 2010, section I.C.1.8.8). [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
This test case led to an interesting discussion of whether and under which conditions a document that could be accessed via the Internet was indeed available to the public within the meaning of A 54.The Boards love things that are “direct and unambiguous”. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 12:00 am by James Rogers
As a result of his plea, Forbes is required to register as a sex offender under I.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
In other words, there is no indication in document D1 from which it can be derived that, when the group R contains 8 carbon atoms, there necessarily have to be 4 ethoxylate units in the alcohol of formula R-(O-CH2-CH2)k-OH (see Case Law of the Boards of appeal, 6th edition, I.C..4.1.1.c).[5.3] As document D1 was the only document used to challenge the novelty of claim 1, the Board comes to the conclusion that the claimed subject-matter of claim 1 of the impugned patent is novel (A 54).The… [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 4:43 am by kevin-vonkamecke
 Per I.C. 29-1-5-8, provisions in favor of a former spouse are revoked. 3. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:31 am
Indianapolis, IN - In an update to our earlier blogs, the Hollywood Report has published a long article about Indiana's Right of Publicity Law, I.C. 32-36-1-8, and the pending bill to amend that law. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 8:53 am
Indianapolis, IN - In an update to our blog last week, a bill in the Indiana General Assembly that would make changes to Indiana's Right of Publicity Law, I.C. 32-36-1-8, passed the Indiana House, 85-7, on January 30. [read post]