Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 6-9(b)(5) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS"
Results 121 - 140
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Family Court Act § 412(2)(d), Domestic Relations Law § 236B(5-a)(b)(5) and § 236B(6)(b)(4) were amended to fix the date of the biennial adjustment of the temporary, post-divorce and spousal maintenance "income caps" at March 1" rather than January 31', as currently provided. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
Justice RM LodhaSupreme Court of IndiaThe Full Bench of the Supreme Court in Gian Singh Vs. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
But the 5 Cal. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
The Transparency Project has published a summary of Re B, R & G (a Child) [2022] EWHC 320 (Fam), in which the local authority was applying for reporting restrictions for the trial of G and E’s parents, who were charged with the murder of E. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
QUESTIONS PRESENTEDii LIST OF PARTIESPursuant to Supreme Court Rule 24.1(b), the following list identifies all of the parties before theKentucky Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Respondents’ boycott thus has no special characteristics meriting an exemption from the per se rules of antitrust law.6 Thus, the Supreme Court found that the antitrust laws at issue were balanced against countervailing First Amendment values at the definitional level, and this in turn meant that there was no need to do an ad hoc balancing of the competing interests, taking into account the particular defendants’ interests, as the… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Someone will go seriously old skool and play Cumming v Danson or Say v Smith, the quiet one in the corner will drone on about how everyone else always forgets AG Securities, there is always an argument about Bruton, but (and if there is a point to this introduction, this is it) there is now a new giant on the scene, one judgment to rule them all and in its 9 strong constitution bind them - the Supreme Court decision in Pinnock (you might like to check out our note… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Someone will go seriously old skool and play Cumming v Danson or Say v Smith, the quiet one in the corner will drone on about how everyone else always forgets AG Securities, there is always an argument about Bruton, but (and if there is a point to this introduction, this is it) there is now a new giant on the scene, one judgment to rule them all and in its 9 strong constitution bind them - the Supreme Court decision in Pinnock (you might like to check out our note… [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
(Amended Opinion) U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, May 08, 2008 US v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada addressed the mandate of the Law Society in Green. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Supreme Court in Nestlé v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 7:10 am
Pretrial Conferences According To The Illinois Supreme Court Rules. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
Now, in a 6-5 en banc bungle that wipes away much history and seasoned sense that demands accountability for prosecution weaseling, a new rigid rule rules the roost, sending the '551 chicken back to the broiler of district court. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
” Plaintiffs alleged that these statements were false or misleading, in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5, in light of allegedly undisclosed conflicts of interest in collateralized debt obligations. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
The trial court denied Seidel's motion without a hearing on July 6, 2017. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
” GA Code § 15-6-3(3). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
Link to Court of Appeals Docket here ---> 01-15-00943-CV Background In their Second Amended Statement of Claim, the Parkers, pursuant to the rules of the Financial Industry National Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"),[1] initiated arbitration proceedings against IB. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
§ 15A-1002(b) (2017). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Samara then counterclaimed against Zargari for the original debt and filed a motion to transfer venue to Harris County.Zargari amended her petition on September 9, 2016 adding a DTPA claim. [read post]
