Search for: "IN RE HENRY C." Results 121 - 140 of 497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
., Ltd. lost a trade mark infringement case regarding its ‘Double C’ logo in China.Katfriend Thomas Key reports on the recent decision of the US Supreme Court in Iancu v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Cunningham, et al. as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Neither Party, In Re: Donald J. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A national identity, in a multicultural, multilingual, and highly mobile population, is a challenging concept for a modern post-nation state democracy. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Elissa Slotkin’s campaign captures the upcoming fundraising scene in Washington perfectly: “You’re about to be inundated. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
In Henry, the trial court found waiver, and 1 dissenting justice on the San Antonio court of appeal agreed. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Henry Carr J concluded that reference to prosecution history in trade mark cases “is the exception, and not the rule”, even more so than in patent cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 3:59 am by Administrator
Intitulé : Bain c. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
In In re Marriage of Suggs, the Washington Supreme Court set aside a civil harassment restraining order that barred "knowingly and willfully making invalid and unsubstantiated allegations or complaints to third parties which are designed for the purpose of annoying, harassing, vexing, or otherwise harming [plaintiff] and for no lawful purpose. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
… Major Philosophers rarely or never cited Heraclitus, Parmenides, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Protagoras, Epicurus, Zeno of Citium, Plotinus, Epictetus, Gregory the Great, John the Scot, Avicenna, Averroes, Roger Bacon, John Calvin, Baruch Spinoza, George Berkeley, Henri Bergson, Alfred North Whitehead and Søren Kierkegaard, all named in that earlier list of major philosophers, fill that bill. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 201(b)(2) and 201(c)(2), the Court takes judicial notice of the offered documents.[2]C. [read post]