Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF B. M. R., A CHILD" Results 121 - 140 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2023, 7:38 pm by Michael Froomkin
aux bénédictions et aux malédictions mitigées de l’IA, il est clair que nous ne sommes qu’au début d’une longue évolution. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 8:44 pm
I'm going to go with mental overload because I refuse to cede the power to communicate to B of A musak. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:21 am by Adam Schwartz
For those interested, we have included the citations to these changes. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
This provision was designed to avoid the effect of delaying tactics by the abducting parent, which were progressively becoming systematic by virtue of article 13(b) of the 1980 Hague Convention (allowing the authorities of the country to which the child has been abducted, to refuse exceptionally to order the return if to do so would be to expose that child to a serious risk of harm). [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am by David Post
To the extent “intermediate scrutiny” has teeth — and I’m generally skeptical of this point — it comes in part (b): Has the government demonstrated that these disclosure provisions do not “burden substantially more speech than necessary” to advance that interest? [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Tuesday 8 December 2015 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of In the matter of B (A child) regarding the appellant’s application for their daughter, B, to be made a warden of the court because the respondent had taken her to Pakistan. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
Kisling, 24, of Mansfield, Ohio, was charged with sexual exploitation of a child, receiving, distributing and possessing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, and identity theft, said  Steven M. [read post]
19 May 2016, 10:18 am by Eugene Volokh
It is apparent that any order seeking to enjoin speech must be based on detailed findings of fact that (a) identify a compelling interest that the restraint will serve and (b) demonstrate that no reasonable, less restrictive alternative to the order is available. [read post]