Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF R. P., A CHILD"
Results 121 - 140
of 834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 9:23 am
Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000) (plurality opinion), which we have implemented in In re Adoption of C.A.,137 P.3d 318 (Colo. 2006), and in In re B.J., 242 P.3d 1128 (Colo. 2010)....Just as the fit parents’ decision to consent to a guardianship is presumed to be in the best interests of the child, so too their decision to seek termination of the guardianship and regain care, custody, and control of the child is presumed to be in the best… [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:59 am
Plan administrators, as plan fiduciaries, are required to discharge their duties prudently and solely in the interest of plan participants and beneficiaries. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:45 am
An Interesting Case from Oklahoma I recently read a very interesting appellate opinion out of Oklahoma where the court held that the express exclusion of one child does not prevent unmentioned children from taking as pretermitted children. [read post]
29 May 2017, 7:31 am
R. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:11 am
"Perez-Vera Report P 108. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 6:22 am
R. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
The Council for Public Interest Law set up by the Ford Foundation in USA defined "public interest litigation" in its report of Public Interest Law, USA, 1976 as follows: "Public Interest Law is the name that has recently been given to efforts provide legal representation to previously unrepresented groups and interests. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:54 am
By Joy P. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 10:56 am
We are now going to do X (such as, seek guardianship over your child in order to provide treatment you are refusing). [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 3:21 am
Recently, in R. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 3:36 am
See: R. v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:01 pm
Richard P. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:08 am
[P]arents have fundamental rights in the custody and control of their children under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment …. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:23 am
Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Matthew R. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:23 am
Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Matthew R. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 11:40 pm
Specifically young underage p***y. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:58 pm
The Missoula county District Judge Edward P. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 6:37 pm
R. 501 (Eng. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:56 pm
Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England p. 442 (1765). [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:36 pm
If you have concerns with regard to child relocation, the lawyers at the office of James P. [read post]
