Search for: "INSIGHT HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC" Results 121 - 140 of 205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
Chattem Inc., et. al., (Docket Report) M D Florida: Difficulty determining expiration of patent requires false marking complaint to plead knowledge of expiration with specificity: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
General Foam Plastics Corp (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court Kansas: Third Party infringers have no standing to challenge assignment: KMMentor, LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Despatch Industries – In PV furnace case green patent litigation moves upstream (Green Patent Blog) Heathcote Holdings Corp – False marking Plaintiff’s chosen form not given deference: Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:30 am by Matthew D. Donovan
Earlier this month, in Atlantis Management Group II LLC v Nabe (2018 NY Slip Op 32460[U] [Sup Ct, NY County, October 1, 2018]), Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla, whose insightful decisions are no strangers to this blog, found that an outside investor-member of four NYC gas stations organized as LLCs was entitled to the books and records specifically listed in LLCL § 1102 and the parties’ operating agreement. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Those efforts were put on hold for several years due to Hurricane Katrina in 2005. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
On the same day, an application was heard in the case of Davidoff v Google LLC KB-2023-000977. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Adviser Sanctioned for Filing False Information on Form ADV and Failing to Disclose to Clients Its Precarious Financial Condition LPB Capital d/b/a Family Office Group, LLC and Gary G. [read post]
6 May 2021, 8:24 am by Kristian Soltes
Together, we looked at data from Prosper Insights & Analytics studies on mobile payment trends. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The ClientEarth action is an innovative use of litigation to encourage better corporate governance by holding a company’s directors personally liable for failing to properly prepare for the net zero transition. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IP tango)   Canada OECD confirms Canada among lowest sources of counterfeiting (Michael Geist)   Chile Chilean wine does not escape piracy (IP tango)   China IP as loan collateral – another China innovation policy (China Hearsay) Look behind the headlines and China’s patent miracle is a lot easier to explain (IAM) Raising the bar of novelty – amended Patent Law (China Blawg) China patent series: Inventors and ownership (Maier & Maier)   Europe CFI: THINKING… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
G-2/08 (PatLit) MARQUES and other organisation take united position on the Cooperation Fund (Class 46) EU communication on future of competition law framework for motor vehicle sector (BLOG@IP::JUR) EU ‘Friends of the Presidency Group’ discussing non-agricultural geographic indications (BLOG@IP::JUR) Scents and sense – or perfumes for peanuts? [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
” Thailand Thailand’s pro-democracy groups have been holding gatherings to press for the abolition of a law tha [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: WTO panel releases decision in US complaint against China over its IP laws (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (ContentAgenda) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Michael Geist) (Law360) (Techdirt) (Patent Docs) WIPO press release: ‘Global economic slowdown impacts 2008 international patent filings’ (WIPO) (IPKat) (Law360)… [read post]
 Voyager’s counsel offered their view that the crypto assets held on its platform are “assets of the estate” pursuant to the terms of the customer agreements, which authorizes Voyager to hold crypto assets in commingled accounts and to use them on the customer’s behalf.[13] This unresolved issue will likely become critical as Voyager’s bankruptcy case proceeds. [read post]