Search for: "INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM PRODUCTS V US"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Using such terms to refer to one's commercial choices does not create a First Amendment right to contract, or not to contract. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:55 pm
Court of International Trade. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
Hicks v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
The first international treaty regarding the scope of cultural property was the Hague Convention on Laws and Customs of War on Land enacted in 1899 in response to the ruination and looting of cultural property. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Haugen previously leaked internal company research to that effect in 2021. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Circuit explained in its 1980 FTC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am
The respondents are part of a group of companies that buy and sell tobacco products internationally. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
The posts were not sent from work, during work hours, or using the employer's equipment. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:42 pm
Blume v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:31 am
Teamsters (US 21-1449 6/1/23)). [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
From Monday's decision in Hicks v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Further, if there is no expectation of profit, it is a product. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:52 am
Background The employer in this case, Glacier Northwest, delivers highly perishable concrete to its customers, which it transports in trucks using rotating drums to prevent the concrete from hardening during transit. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:52 am
Background The employer in this case, Glacier Northwest, delivers highly perishable concrete to its customers, which it transports in trucks using rotating drums to prevent the concrete from hardening during transit. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:26 am
Spansion, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 2:50 am
Sheldon, v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
This was overturned because of the use of an appeal standard pointing out errors in the evidence base; notably, a requirement for there to be as many as five rivals in an area before it was to be considered competitive, which simply contradicted relevant customer evidence. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:55 am
Split Decision Music, LLC, Opposition No. 91249613 [Opposition to registration of SPLIT DECISION for "Entertainment services in the nature of live visual and audio performances, namely, musical rock band" on the grounds of nonownership, fraud, and and likelihood of confusion with the identical mark allegedly used first by the opposer for the same services.]June 28, 2023 - 11 AM: In re Qx World Kft., Serial No. 79280195 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark OMNIS for… [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
US military leaders have also expressed fears about Beijing's influence on Mexico's communications industry, where 80 percent of telecoms are provided by Chinese companies, according to General Glen VanHerck, commander of both US Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
It doesn’t seem fair that we are often left to guess the law, or to scramble for answers, or pay a lawyer to tell us about the law that, in a democracy, belongs to us. [read post]
