Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2012, 4:13 pm
When we first read Steiden v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:55 pm
Drug and Device Law points us to an article in Saturday's Wall Street Journal: Ashcroft v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 5:15 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
” entries refer to sections of the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual, which you can find here, and which sets out the factors and standards that factor into federal sentencing. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 10:57 pm
United Kingdom. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:38 pm
Tracked: The Supreme Court Shouldn't Let Technology Trump the Constitution This week we filed a friend-of-the-court brief in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am
This law as amended was the copyright law of the United States from July 1, 1909 through December 31, 1977. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 6:42 pm
Relying on the 2019 Supreme Court of the United Kingdom decision in Ca [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, (1999) and Murphy v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
The United States has a "federated system," said Hall, with four main biometric databases that after 9/11 all began to share data directly or indirectly. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:37 am
The United States has a formal policy on the subject of laptop border searches readily available; Canada doesn’t. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
The first case is United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
As Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am
The Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics tabled its report on the federal government’s use of technological tools capable of extracting personal data from mobile devices and computers. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 9:43 pm
Perhaps raising the felony bar resolves some of these problems, but only if the statute is also amended to ensure that the government cannot aggravate the sentence by stacking convictions from the same course of conduct, as it did in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:47 am
Following a trial in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Defendant prevailed. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
