Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2018, 4:50 am
This article focuses on the patent marking requirements for the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 2:03 pm
CompCo sells its goods globally, and some of the goods end up in the U.S., infringing on Lenovo’s patent in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:57 pm
A Ninth Circuit decision supports the CBP’s position, holding that “reasonable suspicion is not needed for customs officials to search a laptop or other electric device at the international border” (United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
In the United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
Specifically, the court notes in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
Upon sentencing, the court shall forward to the Division of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse's Intoxicated Driving Program Unit a copy of a person's conviction record. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:05 am
In the past year, several Federal Circuit decisions defined situations in which software inventions could be eligible for patenting in the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
Before marketing a device, each submitter must receive an order, in the form of a letter, from FDA which finds the device to be substantially equivalent (SE) and states that the device can be marketed in the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm
People v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am
Indeed, those means often will be the exact same: a particular exploit providing access to an enemy device, network, etc. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:39 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
The requirement of authentication is thus a condition precedent to admitting evidence” (United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
The judge wielded a "broad axe" and assessed the loss of profits at £14.45 per unit x 1,755 units i.e. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
`District courts are required to conduct evidentiary hearings only when a substantial claim is presented and there are disputed issues of material fact that will affect the outcome of the motion.' United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:30 pm
The New York Times reports that passengers on foreign airlines to the United States from ten airports in eight Muslim-majority countries have been barred from carrying electronic devices larger than a cell phone under new flight restrictions. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
Nothing in this Ordinance shall prohibit an entity authorized by state law to dispense Medical Marijuana from making deliveries of Medical Marijuana to the residence or business of an authorized individual or health care facility as permitted by relevant state law, subject to the applicable requirements of this Ordinance. [read post]
