Search for: "In Interest of Adkins" Results 121 - 140 of 142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2009, 4:38 am by Woodrow Pollack
Adkins, 395 U.S. 653 (1960)], receives the strict construction warranted by a provision that constrains a constitutional, statutory, or other legal right. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
Other interesting pedestrian incident related statistics include where they are located. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 2:28 pm
For those interested in the future of law and law firms, this is the place to be. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 10:36 am by Ross
Adkins III and Ross Kodner, are both pioneers and leaders in legal technology. [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:08 am
More than 1,000 firms expressed interest in the program, she says. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:12 am
Adkins, but that case dealt with patent law and has not been expansively applied by courts since originally announced during an era of judicial hostility to intellectual property rights. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:12 am
Adkins, but that case dealt with patent law and has not been expansively applied by courts since originally announced during an era of judicial hostility to intellectual property rights. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:58 am
Anyway, I found a couple of articles lurking from last year that may be of interest to you for technology assessment, planning, budgeting, networking, etc.Andy Adkins & Natalie Kelly wrote Reliable Law Office Technology: Priceless based on a presentation at the ABA TECHSHOW 2007. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:58 am
Anyway, I found a couple of articles lurking from last year that may be of interest to you for technology assessment, planning, budgeting, networking, etc.Andy Adkins & Natalie Kelly wrote Reliable Law Office Technology: Priceless based on a presentation at the ABA TECHSHOW 2007. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 12:26 pm
As my friend and long-time fellow legal technologist Andy Adkins, Director of the Legal Technology Institute at the University of Florida College of Law once observed, “you can’t automate chaos. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 8:25 am
Yesterday I was privileged to participate in a very interesting panel. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 4:02 pm
Adkins which held that a public policy interest in invalidating bad patents was strong enough to warrant a limitations on a licensee’s ability to give up its right to challenge a patent’s validity. [read post]