Search for: "In Interest of IV" Results 121 - 140 of 7,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2016, 7:50 am
In Sections III and IV, the focus has been mainly on multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs). [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:12 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Edward Jung, a founder of IV, is on the list. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
Elinson tracks the history of the patent, the inventors, owners, and even looks at the attorneys handling some of the behind-the-scenes matters to show IV's involvement, and concludes that the litigation represents "a new phase" in IV's business model. - Read "Intellectual Ventures Takes Indirect Route to Court" (link)NOTE1: An interesting factoid about the litigation is that the lead attorney for the plaintiff is none other than Ray… [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:04 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
Such loans may constitute a specific source of actual or potential conflict of interest and, therefore, specific requirements have been explicitly included in the CRD IV. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:25 pm by Michael Smith
That’s the subject of Part IV of the series. [1] The nature of the rights in single-member LLCs and multi-member LLCs may differ significantly. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am by Elizabeth Goitein
(Editor’s Note: This is part of a series on the FISA Section 702 reauthorization and reform debate.) [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm by Business Law Post
Below is Part IV of my article comparing certain aspects of Delaware, Nevada and Wyoming business-related legislation. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 2:27 pm by Michael Smith
Continue Reading The post Indiana Series LLCs, Part IV: Setting up an Indiana Series LLC appeared first on Indiana Business Law Blog. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 2:27 pm by Michael Smith
Continue Reading The post Indiana Series LLCs, Part IV: Setting up an Indiana Series LLC appeared first on Indiana Business Law Blog. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:06 am by Broc Romanek
Survey Results: Compensation Consultant Conflicts Disclosure As you know, a new SEC rule (Item 407(e)(3)(iv) of Regulation S-K) requires disclosure if a conflict of interest has arisen in connection with the work of a compensation consultant (whether selected by management or the compensation committee). [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:13 am by Frank Pasquale
The ClassCrits blog has a number of interesting posts up recently. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:14 am by Frank Pasquale
The ClassCrits blog has a number of interesting posts up recently. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 4:31 am by Thorsten Bausch
This goes back to my earlier series of blogs about the EPO’s Problem with the Right Speed (I), (II), (III) and (IV), and I will try not to repeat here what I wrote there. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:00 pm
It is driven by the interests and passions of those telling the narratives. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 1:15 pm by Jonathan Stroud
A light week at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) saw two post grant reviews (PGRs) and 16 inter partes reviews (IPRs) filed, while the District Court clocked in with 49 new complaints, fueled mostly by additions to a few Rothschild campaigns, a few new IV selloff suits, a new defendant added to the WSOU madness (this time, Netgear), and a fair number of competitor suits, pharmaceutical suits, and even a new Gil Hyatt complaint. [read post]
The CRR has been amended by the CRR II (Regulation 2019/876) and the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) V introduced certain new prudential requirements into the CRD IV. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 1:47 am by Steve Lubet
” If this was the route lawyers were going to take, Graham argued they needed to dispense with the charade that they were “guided by a sense of public responsibility higher than the ordinary self-interest of the business men and merchants. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:52 am by Doug Cornelius
For private funds, the most interesting section is: TITLE IV—Unleashing Opportunities For Small Businesses, Innovators, And Job Creators By Facilitating Capital Formation. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 5:46 am by INFORRM
He said the current CPS guidelines and Leveson’s comments on the subject (Volume IV, part J, chapter 2) already gave sufficient weight and clarity to public interest while the judicial system had enough checks and balances to prevent a serious miscarriage of justice. [read post]