Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2010, 10:38 am
Jacob LJ dissents. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:38 am
Jacob LJ dissents. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 2:46 am
I know that the common intention constructive trust is really interesting – empirically as well as in law – but you can’t just jump straight in. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 2:46 am
I know that the common intention constructive trust is really interesting – empirically as well as in law – but you can’t just jump straight in. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
However, he stated there was a “strong public interest in this statutory regime”. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
Rimer LJ cast serious doubt as to whether the rule is appropriate in libel cases: “If the single meaning rule does achieve a fair balance in defamation law between the parties’ competing interests, that would appear to be the result of luck rather than judgment; and how the measure of such claimed fairness might be assessed may anyway be questionable. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:06 pm
McCombe LJ agreed with Laws LJ. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
Buxton LJ gave a concurring judgment and Tuckey LJ agreed with both. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
In paragraph 80, Arden LJ leaves open the possibility of an article 8 challenge if any future claim for possession were made. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:29 am
On Wednesday Stanley Burnton LJ refused permission.What is interesting is that he made it quite clear that, even though this was a second appeal, if Bean J had made his decision following the a trial of the claim, the Lord Justice would have given permission regardless of the outcome. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 6:54 pm
” (Mine is quite a bit more accessible than this new book, so if you’re interested in the field, you might want to start there.) [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 6:04 pm
If this sounds like something you would be interested in, please stop by, give us your thoughts, and sign up for announcements! [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:39 am
It is interesting, therefore, that where the dissenting judges differed from the majority was not on a question of law but on the application of that law to the facts of the case. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
R (on the application of LG) (Appellant) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School (Respondent) & Secretary of State for the Department for Children, Schools and Families (Interested Party) [2010] EWCA Civ 142 (Read judgment here) CA (Civ Div) (Rix LJ, Wilson LJ, Sir Scott Baker) February 26 2010 An exclusion hearing by a school does not engage the pupil’s Article 6 of the Convention since there is no “civil right” to education recognized as… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:05 am
Lord Neuberger MR and Arden LJ disagreed. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
Good faith public interest journalism would not be caught by this provision. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:56 am
The State’s refusal to open the ramps, therefore, is not the reflection of some law or regulatory impulse but of the State’s proprietary interest in ensuring the performance of a contract. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 7:43 am
This case is interesting as it clarifies and confirms some aspects of the various branches of the law of insufficiency which are applied in UK patent law. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:30 am
Jackson LJ, and those who have assisted in its writing, are to be congratulated on their work. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 3:39 am
But Floyd LJ disagreed, considering that the terms of the waiver was sufficient to dispense with RAND entirely. [read post]
