Search for: "In Interest of SJC"
Results 121 - 140
of 421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
” In its review, the SJC vacated the revocation of Hartfield’s probation and remanded the case for a new probation violation hearing. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 5:28 am
So we’ll have to thank the SJC and the Legislature for sticking it to Massachusetts landlords once again. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 1:01 pm
The SJC pulled the case upOnce Chadwick docketed her appeal in the Appeals Court, the SJC sua sponte took the matter up, and solicited amicus briefs on the issue of "Whether Massachusetts will recognize a union-member testimonial privilege, such that the plaintiff in this case, in her underlying employment discrimination action against her employer, would not be required to produce in discovery communications between herself and her union representatives related to her case. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 1:01 pm
Duxbury Public Schools et al, SJC-12054, andwill be poised to decidewhether the Commonwealth recognizes a union-member testimonial privilege that protects communications between a union member and his or her union representative made in the course of a grievance procedure.For unions, union members, and labor and employment lawyers on both sides, the issue raised is significant. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 1:01 pm
The SJC pulled the case upOnce Chadwick docketed her appeal in the Appeals Court, the SJC sua sponte took the matter up, and solicited amicus briefs on the issue of "Whether Massachusetts will recognize a union-member testimonial privilege, such that the plaintiff in this case, in her underlying employment discrimination action against her employer, would not be required to produce in discovery communications between herself and her union representatives related to her case. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:09 am
The Middlesex District Attorney’s office argues that pursuant to G.L. c. 211E, § 3(a)(1), as interpreted by the SJC in a case decided twenty-two years ago, the authority to impose a sentence below a mandatory minimum does not go into effect until the Legislature enacts into law the sentencing guidelines recommended by the Sentencing Commission. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:58 am
” The SJC recognized that the non-payment of condominium fees can have disastrous consequences upon a condominium association, especially smaller projects. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Division of Medical Assistance, 423 Mass. 399 (1996), the Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) held that the essence of federal Medicaid trust law was whether a creditor could reach the settlor-applicant’s interest in the trust, as Congress had implemented “Restatement (Second) of Trusts s. 156 (1959), which provides: “Where the Settlor is a Beneficiary . . . (2) Where a person creates for his own benefit a trust for support or a discretionary trust,… [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Division of Medical Assistance, 423 Mass. 399 (1996), the Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) held that the essence of federal Medicaid trust law was whether a creditor could reach the settlor-applicant’s interest in the trust, as Congress had implemented “Restatement (Second) of Trusts s. 156 (1959), which provides: “Where the Settlor is a Beneficiary . . . (2) Where a person creates for his own benefit a trust for support or a discretionary trust,… [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 11:05 am
To defend himself against the civil suit, then, it was probably in Cosby’s interest to testify—but doing so gave prosecutors information that they will certainly use against him at trial, now that they have changed their minds about prosecuting him. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 11:05 am
To defend himself against the civil suit, then, it was probably in Cosby’s interest to testify—but doing so gave prosecutors information that they will certainly use against him at trial, now that they have changed their minds about prosecuting him. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:35 pm
Adonsoto (http://www.suffolk.edu/sjc/archive/2016/SJC_11978.html)(SJC 11978, 2/11/2016): Record the interviews. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:29 am
" Justice Sullivan went on to wonder whether the SJC's decision in Wenger v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:29 am
" Justice Sullivan went on to wonder whether the SJC's decision in Wenger v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:29 am
"In other words, notwithstanding the SJC's ruling in Duracraft, claims can be dismissed in part even if they are not "based solely" on petitioning activity.NOTES FOR DIE-HARD ANTI-SLAPP FANS1. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) recently held that the simultaneous representation of business competitors by attorneys in different offices of the same law firm does not constitute a per se conflict of interest. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) recently held that the simultaneous representation of business competitors by attorneys in different offices of the same law firm does not constitute a per se conflict of interest. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) recently held that the simultaneous representation of business competitors by attorneys in different offices of the same law firm does not constitute a per se conflict of interest. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:27 am
The SJC addressed this issue on October 26th of 2015 in Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 12:56 am
The SJC made it very clear: The Massachusetts public records statute does not apply to campus police records at private schools. [read post]
