Search for: "In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure"
Results 121 - 140
of 311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
RVS CAPITAL, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, RIO VISTA SALOON, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and DAVID ZWICK, Appellees. 4th District. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
§ 2284 is insubstantial, and that three judges therefore are not required, not because it concludes that the complaint is wholly frivolous, but because it concludes that the complaint fails to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Williams, 425 U.S. 501 (1976); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970); 9 J. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 11:30 am
” Advocates hope that courts will continue to rule in their favor. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 11:23 am
Irrespective of the profession of the intended deponent, discovery even of relevant evidence is subject to the balancing calculus, articulated in Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that measures value against burden. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
Islamic Education Center, a Florida trial court case. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:41 pm
As amended by the HITECH Act, the civil enforcement provisions of HIPAA empower OCR to impose Civil Monetary Penalties on both Covered Entities and BAs for violations of any of the requirements of the Privacy or Security Rules. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 8:08 am
I like voting for judicial incumbents unless they're doing a bad job (examples include ethical lapses, sloppy rulings, and consistently poor in-court behavior). [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
However, on cross-appeal, defendant-wife's sentence is remanded for resentencing where it was procedurally unreasonable because: 1) the evidence supported applying certain enhancements, and the district court failed to make findings sufficient to justify its refusal to ! [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
Richard Re has this blog’s argument analysis. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
Appeals -- Preservation of issue -- Appeal alleging that circuit court had no procedural basis to enter final order -- Where nothing in plaintiff's appendix suggests he raised his procedural argument to the circuit court, and plaintiff has not provided a transcript of the hearing which led to the final order, the appellate court is forced to conclude that the plaintiff has not preserved his procedural argument -- Based on circuit court's factual findings, it… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
If you’re wondering how those cases are racking up their second relist when you’ve never heard of them before, that’s because on February 9, the Court took each of them out of stasis they’ve been lingering in since their original Conferences and relisted them for the February 20 Conference. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
First Amended Complaint, Tompkins v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
Center for Humanities, Inc., 518 U.S. 415, 427 (1996); the rules controlling access to court files are procedural, not substantive. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Florida, 05-8820 While Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:21 pm
LOCASCIO AND IN RE: ESTATE OF SILVIA M. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Bureau of Investigation, No. 07-3511 A defendant's conviction for resisting arrest and assaulting federal officers does not necessarily preclude a civil claim based on the arresting officer's use of excessive force during the arrest. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
The Court looked to the “totality of circumstances,” declining to announce a per se rule. [read post]
