Search for: "In Re: B.R.-2" Results 121 - 140 of 569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
BAP 1998) (Section 105(a), and not section 362(h), was employed because the trustee is not an "individual" within the meaning ofsection 362(h)); In re Elder-Beerman Stores Corp., 206 B.R. 142, 152 (S.D.Ohio 1997); and, In re Stockbridge Funding Corp., 145 B.R. 797, 813 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) (stating a trustee cannot receive damages under 362(h)), among other court's taking the same stance. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 8:16 pm
In re Mid-Atlantic Handling Sys., LLC, 304 B.R. at 130 (citing In re Ice Cream Liquidation, Inc., 281 B.R. at 165). [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am by Frodnesor
Ala. 2/28/06), the court confirmed, like in In re Robinson, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 349801, that the BAPCPA amendments do not abrogate Till v. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am by Frodnesor
Ala. 2/28/06), the court confirmed, like in In re Robinson, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 349801, that the BAPCPA amendments do not abrogate Till v. [read post]