Search for: "In Re: Blair v." Results 121 - 140 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/lSu3tO9CkA -> Google says Java APIs lost copyrightability like Aspirin lost trademark protection over time http://t.co/G3o1IubgdK -> The Federal Circuit has set the stage for granting Apple an injunction against Samsung http://t.co/JjwIib4Db3 -> Protecting IP Rights http://t.co/3QglFXeUGW -> Dennis Blair and Jon Huntsman: Protect U.S. intellectual property rights http://t.co/2DEVYShVvW -> Google Reader Woes Update http://t.co/ebVryYkYFs -> Tech Law Summit 2013… [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
Alan Gura, who successfully argued the landmark Supreme Court gun case District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
§768.096 (presumption against negligent hiring if employer conducts criminal background check); Blair v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Bissell
The strikes may be important in one other key and often unconsidered way – they’re boosting the morale of fighters on the ground. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
bit.ly/xamNyE (Colin O’Keefe, Boris Segalis) “If You’re Gonna Just Read One Blog . . . [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
I used to worry, when I was a child, that Christ died at 3.00 each Good Friday… but was re-assured by a teacher, who had a very slim grasp [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:34 am by Howard Knopf
 For example, re the first two questions, we were told that the website was redone to make if more accessible to the “general user”. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
v=kcCObU0pIp8.This week, China's future global dominance was on full display as foreign leaders headed to Beijing in the hope of securing lucrative projects as part of China's Belt and Road Initiative. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Keith Alexander replied, “On those, you’re starting to get closer to what would be [considered war]” (Harris, 2009, brackets in original). [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:30 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  Yes, Strasbourg endorsed that finding five years later in A v UK (2009) but it is the Belmarsh judgment that led to the withdrawal of Part IV, and which still stands as a precedent binding on lower courts. [read post]