Search for: "In Re: City of Fall v." Results 121 - 140 of 1,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 12:28 pm by Giles Peaker
Jaberi, R (On the Application Of) v City of Westminster (Re Housing Act 1996) (2023) EWHC 1045 (Admin) A judicial review on three grounds: i) Breach of section 193(2) Housing Act 1996 duty to secure suitable accommodation; ii) The Westminster’s allocation policy was unlawful in that it denied the applicant medical need priority reasonable preference, restricting him to homeless reasonable preference; and iii) Breach of the duty under section 166A(9)(a)(ii) Housing… [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  If I were independently wealthy and my actions would not cause other peoples' livelihoods to fall into jeopardy, then I probably would have stepped up to the plate.The City of Greece, New York had a policy not unlike that of my own city. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm by Clayton Simms, Criminal Defense Attorney
AS APPLIED TO THE DEFENDANTS IN THESE CASES, SALT LAKE CITY’S ORDINANCES RE PARK CURFEW AND DISORDERLY CONDUCT VIOLATE THEIR FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS AS PROTECTED BY THE UTAH CONSTITUTION. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:00 am by Matt Brown
You’re a beast of burden being pushed to your cruel fate. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:27 am by Lovechilde
 We’ve seen bridges fall and levies break. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:20 am by Peter Mahler
Hardcore students of business divorce will remember Pappas v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
EME Homer City Generation, upholding the agency’s regime to regulate interstate air pollution. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Wednesday’s argument in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Scalia reassures us that the sky is not going to fall based on this decision. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Golden’s labyrinth falls into nice straight lines of sight showing that the Chevron deference issue in Facebook v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 4:39 am
The city sought the right to remove the signs on its own because Pinnacle hadn't done it, despite being ordered by the court last fall to remove them, Cotterill said. [read post]