Search for: "In Re: M., Mark, III" Results 121 - 140 of 405
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
If you’re wondering how I’m able to make that mildly impressive prediction, take a moment to look over the docket and consider how many suits will be present if just the authors of the 10 amicus briefs show up for argument. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
    A PI for FI on LDNRFrank Industries v Nike [2018] EWCA Civ 497 (Court of Appeal) (March 2018) (not on Bailii)I’m told that back in the day, preliminary injunctions in trade mark cases were two a penny. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am by Thorsten Bausch
Today’s inauguration marks an important step in the reform of the Boards. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:40 pm by Mark Walsh
I’m just saying I will discount the answers because it is not something that’s in the record. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 1:35 pm by familoo
If the local authority oversteps the mark a human right may have been infringed. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In re Lehman Brothers Securities & ERISA Litigation, 655 F. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
This from Sandrine Giroud, Partner at LALIVE in Geneva:I am proud to announce that the Geneva Bar Association includes as of today the role of lawyers in the protection of human rights in its Professional Code of Conduct in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am by Orin Kerr
A few people have asked me to take a look at the case, wondering if it's as crazy and extreme as some (okay, Slate's Mark Stern) say. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Marty Lederman
 See In re Old Glory Condom Corp., 26 USPQ 2d 1216, 1220, n. 3 (TTAB 1993) (‘[I]ssuance of a trademark registration . . . is not a government imprimatur’). [read post]