Search for: "In Re S.W"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
Harris, 33 S.W.3d 767 (Tenn. 2000) (“the State may obtain a superseding indictment at any time prior to trial without dismissing the pending indictment and may then select the indictment under which to proceed at trial”). [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:58 am
’ In re Lipsky, 460 S.W.3d 579, 590 (Tex. 2015). [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 6:51 am
Waltenburg, 270 S.W.3d 308, 318 (Tex.App.2008) (deciding under the Texas version of the UCCJEA that the UCCJEA “does not authorize jurisdiction over a child custody claim concerning a child before its birth”); In re Custody of Kalbes, 302 Wis.2d 215, 733 N.W.2d 648 (Ct.App.2007) (determining that Idaho did not have jurisdiction under the UCCJEA of a child who was not born at the time the Idaho action was instituted and who was later born in Wisconsin); see also In… [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:22 am
Bielicki, 601 S.W.2d 917 did not focus on the value of real estate, but instead, discussed reasonable costs of sale related to a marital business. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
[An interesting court opinion, though I think on balance mistaken.] [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
State, 504 S.W.3d 337 (Tex. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
, 514 S.W.3d 828, 833 (Tex. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
See In re J.P.B. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
Davis, 78 S.W. 1050 (Tenn. 1902). [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 10:41 am
Bank of Tex., N.A., 305 S.W.3d 813,816 (Tex. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 8:19 am
” In re Lipsky, 460 S.W.3d 579, 590 (Tex. 2015). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
In re Trilogy Development Co., 468 B.R. 854 (Bankr. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 10:57 am
—Austin 2016), rev’d per curiam, 567 S.W.3d 327 (Tex. 2019); Prize Energy Res., L.P. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:31 pm
State (Tex.Crim.App. 2005) 173 S.W.3d 502, 503 (Romero)). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
Davis, 842 S.W.2d 588 (Sup. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
" 567 S.W.3d 748, 751 (Tex. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Cash Biz, LP, 551 S.W.3d 111 (Tex. 2018), the Texas Supreme Court ruled that a payday lender had not waived the right to arbitration by seeking the assistance of the public criminal justice system in aid of collection of a civil debt, and disapproved the trial court’s denial of arbitration in a subsequent malicious prosecution and wrongful debt collection action brought by the targeted customers. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
, 945 S.W.2d 812, 818 (Tex. 1997). [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
P. 7.2(b); In re Baylor Med. [read post]
