Search for: "In Re Adoption of TM"
Results 121 - 140
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
(This has implications for moving the TM levers too.) [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
If you rely on internal limits, that won’t work—the right is vague and also you’re focusing on the wrong person. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:25 am
Whether a reasonable observer would think they’re buying the same item. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 2:48 am
" Respondent never used the "tm" or "R" symbols in connection with its antennas, and prior to the filing of its application it took no action to notify competitors that it considered the shape to be a trademark. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 8:32 am
IPAB re-affirmed the aforesaid position in the Instant Order. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:03 am
They’re just different aspects. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
Does interference w/TM interests matter any more than other deception? [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:08 am
New York state claims: they’re substantively the same as the Lanham Act claims. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am
In a world where we’re departing from that, we should consider congressional purposes. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Portugal has adopted something like fair use. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 1:04 am
If ever there were a “sophisticated consumer,” I think we lawyers would like to think we’re it. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
People simply do what they’re going to do, or work around it. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
This is often poor res ipsa analysis. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:17 am
TM and right of publicity law have more clearly thought through the potential harms, and the potential benefits, of claiming an identity that you don’t have. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
A new CJEU referenceIn 2012, France adopted a law allowing the digital exploitation of out-of-print 20th century books. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
It will cause damage to you if you’re not part of the program. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 8:21 am
Do you consider yourself early adopter? [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:55 pm
Though “If you’re into hot-rods, you know Lokar,” that’s not the standard: it’s fame to the general consuming public. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:54 am
What we’re already seeing: software built into all kinds of devices. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under ‘preponderance’ standard: Alexsam… [read post]
