Search for: "In Re Bullock"
Results 121 - 140
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2008, 5:07 pm
"We're glad the court read the law correctly. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:17 am
Bullock, 538 N.E.2d 308, 309 (Ind. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:32 am
Here at Attorney at Work, we’re suckers for stories of personal reinvention, and second (or third) careers. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
Asus Computer International (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Bilski does not invalidate patent claiming ‘electronic payment system’ involving a non-cash ‘spending vehicle’: H&R Block v Jackson Hewitt Tax Service (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Apple IP on input devices (IPBiz) Broadcom – ALJ Charneski’s initial determination based on a settlement agreement terminates both enforcement and modification… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
The statutory provisions that are inconsistent with Judge Davis’ interpretation of Section 9.10(3)(b) have been thoroughly discussed by the blogger Jay Bullock (Folkbum). [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:19 pm
But the bottom line is that we're opening the locks. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 3:14 am
That’s why we’re being so careful about [the details]. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
., Re: Ramlila Maidan Incident, (2012) 5 SCC 1 (Para 43); Selvi v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:07 am
DONATE TO EFF Like what you're reading? [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:25 pm
“I said, ‘It’s encrypted and you’re not going to get anything off of it. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
(Patently-O) Ninth Circuit affirms infringement finding against clothing maker: Quiksilver, Inc. v Kymsta Corp (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB affirms refusal to register, ruling DELI EXPRESS and SAN LUIS depicted ‘in such a manner that consumers would not perceive them as constituting a single composite mark’: In re E A Sween Company (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB: Extreme rareness of RENATI as surname leads to 2(e)(4) reversal: In re The House of Terrance… [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
We’re going to be famous. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
We’re going to be famous. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
No. 337-TA-718 Certain Electronic Paper Towel Dispensing Devices and Components Thereof (ITC 337 Update) Louis Vuitton – LV files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Handbags (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) Radiodetection – ALJ Bullock grants motion to terminate investigation in Certain Underground Cable and Pipe Locators (337-TA-727) (ITC Law Blog) SEB – Amicus briefs for Global-Tech v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
: In re Flowerhorn; In re Bookriff Media Inc; In re Intrafitt, Inc (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Coach Services – CAFC hears oral argument in appeal from TTAB dismissal of COACH opposition: Coach Services, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Heritage Music Foundation (TTABlog) Precedential no. 4: TTAB finds that “NKJV” has acquired distinctiveness for bibles: In re Thomas Nelson, Inc (TTABlog) Precedential no. 3: Finding KUBA KUBA primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive for cigars, TTAB affirms 2(e)(3) refusal: In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate (TTABlog) Precedential no. 2: TTAB cancels supplemental registration for shape of culvert unit due to functionality: Kistner Concrete Products,… [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
If you're interested in attending, please contact Prof. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:58 pm
(IPblog) Denmark Bored Pirate Bay movie uploader fined $28,200 (TorrentFreak) Europe Systran heads for the ultimate showdown in copyright battle over Unix translation software: C-103/11 P European Commission v Systran (1709 Blog) France Anti-piracy outfit will not sue Hadopi ‘hacker’ (TorrentFreak) French ‘three strikes’ anti-piracy software riddled with flaws (ArsTechnica) (TorrentFreak) Germany German police seize Pirate Party servers, looking at… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Take Our Poll And here’s the list of Honorable Mentions, if you’re interested in some additional write-in contenders. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm
See in re College Athlete NIL Litigation, 4:20-cv-03919-CW (N.D. [read post]
