Search for: "In Re Chandler M." Results 121 - 140 of 174
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2010, 4:40 am by SOIssues
"I felt hopeless before I came here, but now I’m rebuilding my life. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:51 am by Broc Romanek
Continued Oversight Deference to Directors: Delaware Dismisses Derivative Claims Below is analysis of a recent decision from Brad Aronstam of Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz: Last week, Chancellor Chandler - in In re Dow Chemical Company Derivative Litigation - dismissed derivative claims that Dow's officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the company in connection with Dow's more than $18 billion acquisition of Rohm & Haas highlights the heavy… [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:50 am by Steve Bainbridge
Jay Brown has named Delaware Chancellor William Chandler's opinion In re Citigroup was # 2 on Jay's list of the 5 worst Delaware corporate law decisions of 2009. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 9:48 pm by Caleb Mason
My exemplars are Ross MacDonald, Raymond Chandler, and James Ellroy. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:37 am by SHG
They think the rest of us are nuts, and the noise we're making is foolish. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:02 am by SHG
Matt Brown at Chandler Criminal Defense has uploaded the paperwork. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
I know, I'm sorry does not repair the mess I made but, that's all I've got. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 7:54 am
The decision thus warrants careful review and consideration by M&A practitioners and those who advise them. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 11:33 pm
U.S. supra (quoting Chandler v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
"We're insulated from the French revolution going on now," says Steele, who like Strine is a Democrat. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:38 am by Belle Lettre
In which Joey and Chandler and Phoebe and Ross seem to camp out at Monica and Rachel's apartment and drop by unannounced all the time and eat food? [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 5:47 am
Mark Chandler, SVP, General Counsel & Secretary, Cisco Systems, Inc.Elisa D. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 1:23 pm
In the Supreme Court's view, the complaint pled “sufficient facts to overcome the business judgment presumption,” thereby requiring an examination of plaintiffs’ allegations under the entire fairness standard of review.[4] The Supreme Court’s analysis provides helpful insight into the nature of the pleading required to overcome the presumption of the business judgment rule in the M&A context. [read post]