Search for: "In Re Goldman" Results 121 - 140 of 1,879
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 2:32 pm by lawshucks
Exhibit A: The Goldman Bonus ‘Bloodbath’ By bloodbath, we’re talking bonuses ranging from flat to down 30 or 40%, depending on area, but at least base pay is flat, unlike… Exhibit B: Bonus Watch ’12: JPMorgan First year associate base pay down to $120 from $125, second years to $140 from $150, bonuses flat. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:05 pm
RSVPs: RSVP to Eric Goldman (egoldman@gmail.com). [read post]
6 May 2012, 1:18 pm by Ed Driscoll
Goldman writes, adding, “If you’re not scared, you haven’t read the numbers.” No wonder the president might be feeling a bit lonely these days. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:18 am by Kevin LaCroix
Beck recalled one of the principals, Milton Gould, as saying: “We're kind of like an octogenarian's gonads, still there but not of much use. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:45 pm by Eric E. Johnson
Okay, so if you’re too lazy to read that, here’s my recap of Goldman’s recap: Righthaven v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:58 am by Buce
So we're back again to a too-familiar mantra: grant that the world needs a functioning finance system, haven't we lost all touch with function here, in favor of letting the casino gamble with the unwitting house's money? [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:53 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Those directors need assurances not only that the company will cover their expenses if they win but also that the company will pay fees as they're incurred. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:36 am by Eric
By Eric Goldman University of Colorado law professor Paul Ohm has written one of the most provocative privacy-related papers of the past few years, Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:56 am by AdamSmith1776
Still in all, I'm not sure we're in the majority. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:57 am by CMS
Dana Feinsohn, trainee solicitor in the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comments on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Goldman Sachs International v Novo Banco S.A. [2018] UKSC 34: On 4 July 2018, the UK Supreme Court handed down its decision in Goldman Sachs International’s (“Goldman Sachs”) appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision of 4 November 2016, which had held that a liability under a facility… [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:15 pm by Ama N. Appiah, Esq.
Hopefully, we’re getting closer.' On Friday, Goldman asked Brazil's attorney general to join his battle before the nation's Supreme Court, and a spokesman for the attorney general's office said the agency was looking into the request. 'We're evaluating how to proceed in this matter. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 4:59 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Follow up to previous posting – Trump Refugee and Visa Order Generates Dissents from Diplomats, DOJ, Goldman Sachs, Silicon Valley – ABA, January 31, 2017: “Our nation has the right to protect its borders to keep our citizens safe. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 4:10 pm by Chris Castle
 It was only a matter of time before Google and its fellow travelers among the usual suspects (Professors Goldman, Geist and Lemley, EFF, Public Knowledge, Center for Democracy and Technology, R Street, Engine and assorted other whingers) piped up about seeking even safer harbors. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:51 am by Eric
By Eric Goldman I’m thrilled to announce the public release of a new casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases and Materials by Rebecca Tushnet and me. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:43 pm by Walter Olson
Judges, the sticklers, still expect it to be done the other way round if you’re going to be the named plaintiff in a class action. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:42 am
This is a free event, so if you're in the area, please come! [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:31 pm
From what I've read, the reason is that Goldman was smarter than the others. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:32 am by Michelle Leder
As we’re starting to see in proxy after proxy this season, Goldman is hardly the only company spending big bucks on executive health care. [read post]