Search for: "In Re Jessica B."
Results 121 - 140
of 249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2016, 12:25 pm
RT: same move is made in In re Tam: §2(a) disparagement is subject to strict scrutiny b/c it’s not commercial speech, but the deception bars in §2 are totally ok because Central Hudson. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am
Said: we’re not all on the same page on harm. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:06 am
Jessica C. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:06 am
Jessica C. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm
Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Risk of losing the right creates need to police.Difference b/t kinds of sports—Mariners said “this is our TM, and we’re afraid of tarnishment. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm
It made me very happy to re-live being 14 years old, at least for a while. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am
Is it res judicata based on Arbino? [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 1:17 pm
Writing for the three-judge panel, Judge David B. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:57 am
From In re D.M. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 10:40 am
V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
The court declined to address defendant’s qualified immunity defense, and remanded for the district court to consider it in the first instance.http://j.st/4s8T11th Circuit:Bankruptcy -- Confirmation -- Chapter 13 plan -- Modification -- Modified plan which proposes plan payments to creditors that escalate over time, with two step-up payments to a fixed payment in months 10-59 and a balloon payment in month 60 of plan, is not confirmable -- Even if, because of the failed mortgage modification… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
A and B may independently create the same work. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:16 pm
Flick and Jessica Nyman September 2015 Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:02 pm
Jessica Silbey: Sidestepping incentive talk and focusing on the way that © affects us all; notice doesn’t necessarily work for us but on us. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
Jessica Litman – What Notice Did Most scholarship on © notice talks about role dividing what’s protected by © from what’s in the public domain. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
Abraham Drassinower & Jessica Silbey: if all you’re about is incentives, then there’s really just one entity, TM/©/patent/IP. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 12:08 pm
Stina Teilmann-Lock (University of Southern Denmark)Commentator | Jessica Silbey (Northeastern University) Openness in the law for fair followers? [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:42 am
G.S. 7B-323(b), (e). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Introduction: Jessica Litman: US judges and lawyers think what they’re doing is directed at what actual consumers perceive, but the Q is how you figure that out. [read post]
