Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2019, 8:23 pm
Last week, in Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:22 am
Imagine you're an appointments committee chair going through a large pile of entry-level resumes. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:05 am
It’s it’s basically saying this is this is what we’re thinking where we’d like to go. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:12 pm
" But wait, if SSRN doesn't publish "advocacy," why is an amicus brief by Orin Kerr, for example (here), publicly available? [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:22 am
For the last four years, I have been serving as an Adviser to an ongoing American Law Institute project, Principles of the Law: Policing. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am
It was a bad decision back then, and we’re paying for it now. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As that well-known legal wag Orin Kerr put it, why bother? [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm
” (para. 70) Referring back to Re Manitoba Language Rights Reference, the Court identified three elements of the rule of law: “the rule of law provides that the law is supreme over the acts of both government and private persons” (one law for all); a system of “positive laws” that “’embodies the more general principle of normative order'”; and “the relationship between the state and the individual must be regulated by law”… [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
The respondent had argued that the Supreme Court decision in In Re McCaughey’s Application for Judicial Review [2011] UKSC 20, [2012] 1 AC 725 needed to be considered in the light of the Grand Chamber’s observations in Janowiec v Russia (55508/07) (2014) 58 EHRR 30. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:05 am
They're being stored temporarily as a part of the process of delivering them. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:44 am
Bird & Bird CEO David Kerr will continue his leadership run after being granted a new three year term. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
(Please, give us something, we’re dying over here!) [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
In Re Beech, Saint v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
We see these provisions occasionally in federal criminal law, but experience with them suggests that they're misguided. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:37 am
It may seem somewhat Dickensian that an unmarried parent would be ineligible for social benefits as a widow/er upon the death of their partner and co-parent, but that was the situation created by the legislation challenged in Re Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2018] UKSC 48 (Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Hodge and Lady Black). [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Kerr gave a separate judgment, disagreeing with the majority’s approach to the legality test and its application of the proportionality test. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
It was open to Mr Price to argue his points on context and domestic violence before the judge as he did, but in my opinion, putting forward what amounts to a re-argument of the appellant’s case on meaning does not assist him in this appeal. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
It was open to Mr Price to argue his points on context and domestic violence before the judge as he did, but in my opinion, putting forward what amounts to a re-argument of the appellant’s case on meaning does not assist him in this appeal. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:50 am
However, it is clear that the subsidiary position of the Scottish Parliament to the UK Parliament and the latter’s unfettered powers to legislate for Scotland have been re-affirmed. [read post]
