Search for: "In Re M & D Sales Co., Inc" Results 121 - 140 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am by Unknown
Wagner’s question, Doug Ellenoff, a partner at Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP, replied that there is a “troubling coordinated narrative we’re hearing. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm by Christa Culver
§ 3771(d)(3).Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (8th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition for Thomas PettersBrief in opposition for Gregory M. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:41 am by Mandelman
  If it wasn’t there, we’d likely be much better off. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  I’m hemmed in by what courts say it is now. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by Mandelman
  All around, I’d have to say that I’m optimistic that it’s good news for homeowners, believe it or not. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 3:06 am
And, in the 15 or so decisions since Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
The co-authors are Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), Michael O’Shea (Oklahoma City), George Mocsary (Connecticut), and me.Below the fold is the full Table of Contents and Preface for the book. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
MVP HEALTH, INC., Appellee. 1st District.Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Revocation of assisted living facility licenses, denial of licensure renewal applications, and imposition of administrative fines -- Claims against licensee were not proven where only evidence to support claims was uncorroborated hearsay -- Claim that licensee operated another assisted living facility without obtaining a valid license or qualifying for a license exemption was not proven… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Advocate General opines advertisement comparing perfume to L’Oreal’s did not infringe trade marks; translation issue: L’Oréal v Bellure (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) (IPKat) (Class 46) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) US Patent reform 2009 (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (Patently-O) (Inventive… [read post]