Search for: "In Re Marriage of Baker"
Results 121 - 140
of 155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2010, 7:29 am
Check out the quote from one of the leaders against the judges:“It appears we’re headed for a resounding victory tonight and a historic moment in the state of Iowa,” said Bob Vander Plaats, the Sioux City businessman who led a campaign to remove the justices because of the 2009 gay marriage ruling. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:53 am
It can’t really be about the gay marriage decision, because even if successful in removing Justices Ternus, Streit and Baker those appointed to replace them will have to write the same decision. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm
The decision was by Justice Fogarty, Baker and Lindenmayer. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 2:00 am
In support of this contention counsel referred us to the decision of Tasmanian Trustees Ltd and Gleeson (1990) FLC 92-156 per Full Court (Nygh J with whom Strauss and Baker JJ agreed).In that case, the husband died while judgment with respect to property settlement was reserved. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
But one of the smartest gay rights litigators I know is Mary Bonauto, the counsel in Gill, who won the Baker case in Vermont and the Goodridge case in Massachusetts. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:45 am
We must be cautious of mergers -- they should not be forced marriages, and must be well-funded. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:37 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0586, 2010 MT 124, IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: LAMOINE R. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:34 pm
" Deborah Baker, Charges Fly In Appeals Court Race; Incumbent Calls Rivalry 'Bizarre,' Albuquerque Journal, May 23, 2010. 5. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:03 am
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room Big Thanks Re: TomFloccoSends WMR: BREAKING! [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
Contributions made by a first spouse who predeceased the testator may support a moral obligation to the adult claimant children of that first marriage: Saugestad v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am
Does this indicate that state legislators in Maryland really don't value marriage as an institution that highly? [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:10 pm
"family" and "marriage", are coming under pressure to evolve; to become more inclusive and less exclusive. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm
"family" and "marriage", are coming under pressure to evolve; to become more inclusive and less exclusive. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 12:09 am
Same-Sex Marriage Case to Stay Two-Party Affair
The Recorder
Try as they might, lawyers from one anti-gay rights organization just can't get any love from judges in California. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
"And whether you're browsing for books, listening to your favorite author read from his or her work, or attending one of the fascinating panels made up of literati of every stripe, Brooklyn is the place to be for booklovers from around the world. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:19 pm
In other words, the interpretation of ILSA is always a marriage between federal statutory law and the contract law of the forum state. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 21, 2009)Affirming dismissal of race/national origin/retaliation-discharge claims re 3 White Instrument Techs8th Circuit> Wallace v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 1:07 am
In this respect, the Iowa Supreme Court has departed from state Supreme Court rulings in Vermont [Baker v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 4:57 pm
In re Marriage of Baker H owns parcels A and B, residing on Parcel A. [read post]
