Search for: "In Re Pacer Technology"
Results 121 - 128
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) Survey results – Next PTO Director (Patently-O) International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) submission to Special 301 Review (Intellectual Property Watch) (Ars Technica) Outline for today’s ABA-ALI presentation on IP ADR (The IP ADR Blog) US congressional, USPTO officials see Geneva policymaking up close (Intellectual Property Watch) US General – Decisions 9th Circuit limits the scope of in-term covenants not to compete: Comedy Club v… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Don’t give up (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco hopes to benefit from Iranian technology expertise (Afro-IP) Netherlands Medical aid association Eers [read post]
29 May 2008, 8:15 pm
Kane Bennett, a member of the Connecticut Bar Association’s Legal Technology Committee. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:22 am
We’re not sure, but PACER account representative Shawn Robledo, also was unaware of the problem until she was guided through the process of downloading, copying and pasting. [read post]
28 May 2008, 10:19 am
"We're going to try to take steps to correct that error. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:34 pm
Of course the Federal Court system has had electronic filing for years through its Pacer system. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 8:16 am
., No. 03-cv-01267--in which the court (Judge Carney, in this case) reconsidered a defendant's summary judgment motion in view of In Re Seagate Technology, LLC, 83 USPQ2d 1 (Fed. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 4:48 pm
Aren’t we also behind the technology curve on this? [read post]
