Search for: "In Re Rebecca B."
Results 121 - 140
of 307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2016, 2:55 pm
His now famous phrase, about a game (or a season) not being over until it’s over has become the archetype for a thought which is a) true, b) egregiously obvious and c) useless. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 10:54 pm
“I was chair of the admissions committee and we’re sitting there watching this,” Mr. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
B.: The Elsevier representative thanked Rebecca for this contribution to the listserv, adding, “You’ve got the complete de-coupling of the two models in our hybrid titles spot on. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
Two class actions allege that profiles are commercial speech violating attys’ publicity rights, b/c we’re monetizing w/advertising. [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:25 pm
RT: same move is made in In re Tam: §2(a) disparagement is subject to strict scrutiny b/c it’s not commercial speech, but the deception bars in §2 are totally ok because Central Hudson. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am
K-12 and disciplinary distinctions don’t make sense b/c we’re talking about educating students. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Rasenberger: they’d have to be part of the service, which they’re not. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
[Lots of notices b/c lots of internet!] [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
They do their own screening of IP rights, and are generally cautious b/c they’re academic institutions. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
Does that mean it’s content neutral, b/c what you’re regulating is the source identification function? [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
§ 103(b). [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Distinction b/t creative authorship and discovery of facts. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 9:16 am
In re Christena Obregon, Esq., 2016 VT 32By Andrew DelaneyI hate doing my taxes. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:29 am
Trademark Cases"Professor Rebecca Tushnet Says the CAFC's Reasoning in In re Tam Was WrongRecommended Reading: Marc J. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm
Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Session 1: Entitlement DesignModerator: Rebecca L. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 2:42 am
In her forthcoming article, The First Amendment Walks into a Bar: Trademark Registration and Free Speech, Notre Dame Law Review (download from her 43(B)log here), Professor Rebecca Tushnet argues that the CAFC got it wrong in In re Tam [THE SLANTS]. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
This question for advertisers is very significant, b/c of FTC’s interpretation of §5. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:46 pm
Feb. 22, 2016) H/T Rebecca Tushnet Related Posts on Keyword Advertising * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 5:33 pm
Rebecca Curtin, Contractual Origins of Authors’ Rights: Looking for deals showing an idea of literary property not dependent on possession of the actual manuscript. [read post]
