Search for: "In Re The Detention Of R. I."
Results 121 - 140
of 653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2018, 3:28 pm
AB 450, known as the Immigration Worker Protection Act, provides that California employers: May not allow federal immigration officials to access the employer’s nonpublic work areas unless the officials have a judicial warrant; May not allow federal immigration officials to access employee records without a subpoena or judicial warrant; Must provide notice to its employees before and after the federal government inspects the employer’s I-9 forms; and May not… [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:45 am
We're dropped into the middle of things, and Trump is all emotional and spouting lies. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:03 am
What About Detention? [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:58 am
“You’re pregnant too? [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
“Do I have a lawyer? [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Below is a listing of Open Access literature that I have referenced on this blog since 15 March 2018. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
See In re S.W., 175 N.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:04 pm
But to the extent that there exist procedures guiding the House Intelligence Committee through this process, they’re spelled out in the Standing Rules of the House. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:00 pm
Below is a listing of Open Access literature that I have referenced on this blog since 15 November 2017. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:54 pm
Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Rand Paul (R-KY) about the civil liberties implications of border searches of digital devices during their confirmation processes. [read post]
November Reasonably Suspicious Podcast: Let me be your lawyer dog, or I won't be your man at all ...
12 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
I mean, we're only cousins. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
I hope I am mistaken about that—but it's difficult to come up with any other explanation for it.In this post, I’ll try to identify many of the most remarkable characteristics of the SG’s petition. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
As a brief refresher, the procedural highlights are as follows: February 2008: Bahlul is re-charged under the 2006 Military Commissions Act (“2006 MCA”) with conspiracy to commit war crimes, solicitation of others to commit war crimes, and providing material support for terrorism. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Detention. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
But the Supreme Court allowed prisoners at the base to challenge their detention in 2004 (full disclosure: I was lead counsel in that case, Rasul v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 12:07 pm
” This, I think, violates the First Amendment, which is why I’m helping represent Rynearson, pro bono, in challenging the order. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 10:34 am
We're happy to discuss your case, and see if you have a claim. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am
I think not. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
In The Endgame, Michael R. [read post]
