Search for: "In Re United States, Petitioner"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2014, 7:19 pm
May 5, 2015) (non-precedential).Issue“The Board of Trustees for the University of Illinois (“University”) petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) and its Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) to withdraw its orders instituting inter partes review in cases IPR2013-401 and IPR2013-404. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:54 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:05 pm
Jan. 2, 2019) (condition that respondent file a petition on behalf of petitioner for immigration to the United States after respondent’s move to the United States was not met); Chumachenko v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 8:14 am
United States, 786 F.2d 546 (2d Cir.1986) (same); United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 5:57 am
” Respondent was indisputably indigent and had a large family to support in the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
J.B., a United States citizen, was born in the Ukraine in 2008 to Petitioner and Respondent Olga Blackledge, a Ukrainian citizen and lawful permanent resident of the United States who currently resided in Pittsburgh, United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:59 am
United States, No. 09--3033 (6th Cir. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:37 pm
Procedural HistoryDominion Dealer Solutions, LLC, petitioned the Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office to institute inter partes reviews of five patents owned by AutoAlert, Inc. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:27 pm
Three of the petitioners -- Aiken County in South Carolina, the State of South Carolina, and the State of Washington -- are state or local governments of localities that are home to sites that temporarily store spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste pending the opening of a federal nuclear waste repository. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
Gunn, 10-1004, which involves a question of personal jurisdiction over the foreign producer of an allegedly defective motorcycle tire sold in the United States, is a likely hold for J. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:53 pm
The mother then filed a Hague petition in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
Arizona, et al., Petitioners v United States The Court decided by five votes to three that three of four provisions inArizona’s Senate Bill 1070 were null. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:50 am
In re S.E.O., 873 F.Supp.2d 536, 546 (S.D.N.Y.2012). [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:53 am
In re D.T.J.2013 WL 3866636 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 1:56 am
United States, respondent-appellees
U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am
Those are all great performances because of the challenge, and yet they're still merely roles within roles, rather than the true analogy here: roles within roles within roles.The mental challenge of applying three or more layers of varying legal standards probably explains why, in deciding whether to grant interim relief of interim relief of interim relief (as the Supreme Court was ostensibly deciding in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:44 am
Maples’ subsequent federal habeas petition was denied by the United States District Court on procedural default grounds, and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
United States, 08-1301.) [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:02 am
And one additional observation: Things are getting crowded in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
