Search for: "In The Matter Of: E.R"
Results 121 - 126
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Even before the Statute of Monopolies (1623), the Crown rewarded an inventor with a limited monopoly in exchange for public disclosure of “a new invention and a new trade within the kingdom … or if a man hath made a new discovery of any thing”: Clothworkers of Ipswich Case (1653), Godb. 252, 78 E.R. 147, at p. 148, where the court went on to say that the effect of an unjustified monopoly was “to take away free-trade, which is the birthright of every… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Particularly, if the foreign court otherwise had subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
” Thus, the unavoidably unsafe concept is inherently incompatible with the concept of design defect because no matter what their design they are “incapable of being made safe. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
By Thomas A. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Can neighbours sue for historic contamination? [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
