Search for: "In The Matter Of: S.C.R."
Results 121 - 140
of 374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2016, 6:18 am
Rafuse, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 147). [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:55 am
., 2014 SCC 53, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 633, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the interpretation of a contract should have regard to the facts surrounding the making of the contract. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:08 am
Shafron, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 157 and Transport North American Express Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 8:24 am
Creston Moly Corp. [2014] 2 S.C.R. 633, the B.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
The Torstar case was abundantly clear that writing on matters of public interest is not reserved to the mass media. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
On November 26, 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) issued what may prove to be its most important copyright ruling to date in terms of its effect on tariffs, the tariff making process, the Copyright Board and the copyright bar. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Canada (National Energy Board), [1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, at p. 394: …what would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically – and having thought the matter through – conclude. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Whether the Courts will agree may be another matter, which may get addressed in judicial review of this decision and perhaps much sooner in the AC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Gruenke, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 263, at p. 289. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
(Forbes)Here's an update on the Access Copyright Hearing for a Post-Secondary tariff that supposedly was concluded on January 22, 2016.I attended to hear the final oral arguments in Access Copyright’s Post-Secondary tariff hearing at the Copyright Board on Friday, January 22, 2016. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 11:26 am
., 1984 CanLII 33 (SCC), [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, [1984] S.C.R. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 4:01 am
“These already challenging matters – Are there any duties or responsibilities owed to opposing parties? [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am
Breznitz claims The professor begins with a little history to make the non-contentious points that modern trade secret law recognizes that certain circumstances justify legal protection for trade secrets, but such laws, as a matter of policy, do not apply to information that has been disclosed publicly and further, that the laws are sensitive to rights of individuals to apply their skills and the interest of the public in free and competitive markets. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Stevens, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 467, and the context of the statutory scheme set out in the Copyright Act. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
Ontario (Attorney General), 2001 SCC 15, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 470, at para. 77, and Attorney-General v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 5:30 pm
Whether or not I/Land actually was negligent is a matter for trial. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
Leonati 1996 CanLII 183 (SCC), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
Canada, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821 at 839, 16 C.R. (3d) 294, 50 C.C.C. (2d) 495, 105 D.L.R. (3d) 745, 30 N.R. 380. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:09 pm
Obviously the media cannot seek standing if they do not have notice of the matter. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:00 am
Canada, 1999 CanLII 675, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 497, and progeny. [read post]
